21 cases of tampering with evidence in 6 months, theft, armed robbery, felony possession of controlled substances, felony driving under the influence of a controlled substance, lying on an official report, abuse of power, and intoxication on duty by a police officer and he got two years probation? After his force tried to hide what happened, delay, mitigate, minimize, etc.

In Texas, he should be getting life in prison for the marijuana alone and every penny he or his family has should go to repaying the hundreds of people he illegally arrested, including his pension….his department on the hook for the rest.

*promote exposing exactly who the absolute best in law enforcement really are. A rock star, dedicated, decorated super cop….their golden boy….more of a criminal than everyone he ever arrested combined. Typical.

Where are the good apples. I’ve never seen one. Just a few bad apples, and a few more, couple more, one more bushels, a few trucks full, and 17 train loads, and 4 super size cargo ships full…not a good one to be found in the bunch.

Shoot back with black tallons. Where are all Trump's "ready to go" 2A people? Certainly they would stand against this tyrannical thuggery....unless they're really all babies cowering behind and threatening with their guns but only when only they have guns to threaten with. No. Couldn't be.

Fucking violent thugs shooting people peacefully sitting on their porch.
They have zero authority to make you be INSIDE, only on your property.
This is not policing.

Shoot those thugs in the head like Trump said to. Presidential order through Twitter, shoot the THUGS. Burn their hideouts too...police stations. They aren't policing, so they don't deserve them.

I won't piss on a cop if they're on fire, or use my breaks if they're in front of my moving vehicle. By far, they're the most violent gang in America.

@bobknight33, does giving someone a nice ride on the clock excuse this? Or illegally arresting the press? Or repeatedly unannounced, shooting people dead in their homes, or repeatedly suffocating people in public using banned control methods, and how about lying about all of it until civilian video goes public?
Edit: You patriots aren't doing a thing to stop this tyrannical clampdown, gangs of THUGS shooting peaceful citizens on their porch backed by tanks, I guess all that "our guns protect us from a tyrannical government takeover" is definitely bullshit, we're sending those thugs to your house next to collect your guns, you don't need them anymore since you're all snowflakes.

Still nothing is said about Occupy "leaders" who were illegally arrested on trumped charges. I know of a few instances so I am sure it is/was more widespread.

Its true, I hate to sound paranoid or alarmist but I definitely do not think it was coincidental that bill was passed a bit after the immense popularity of Occupy. They plan on fighting dissent and popular protest on our own soil and not in the ways they do it now: all media, police state, illegal arrests etc but with the mofuggin military. Demonic, unpatriotic, robot, bastards.

But, if they do decide to use the military on our own soil... it may end up benefiting the real rulers of the country, the 99%! Heh heh heh.



>> ^csnel3:

I am glad this man is fighting the good fight, as he spoke , I'm think "hell yes, those bastards are overstepping the line" . And then , what he says in the last 15 sec of this video, just floors me. He is talking about the infamous WTSHTF scenario!! He thinks the elite are getting ready!!! Alex Jones was right!!

>> ^kceaton1:

>> ^Yogi:
>> ^raverman:
If you're going to declare war, you better be sure you can defend as well as attack.
They are legion...
Are you? Can you fight off 10 to 1 highly skilled and motivated individuals?

If the US government is on your side and they think it's important enough to find out where these people are and kill them then yeah. Obviously that's not what happened here...just a dumb CEO making claims he can't back up.
Look I love Anon, and Wikileaks, but if the US wanted to be big bad Empire...they could spill a LOT of blood.

I agree, but I think the U.S. would lose that war eventually unless they can get everyone (they can't) everywhere (they won't, that's war; playing illegal arrest on foreign grounds). The U.S. is not Superman. But, Anonymous has one very deadly weapon, knowledge and a plan of action (as proofed by this guys upheaval). They would lose as a PR game. Sure in the U.S. things might seem semi-peachy, but outside we'd have little footing to stand on. I literally think it would cause an inverted response that you may think they're ready for, but the U.S. has sucked at International PR for a long time. Causing people to "disappear" or arresting them only unleashes the dogs of war.
I frankly don't see the U.S. being able to hold up (certainly, as some countries like China would be happy to have anon). It would be a terrible decision and one they won't make, as we'll be a dictatorship by then. If Colbert is giving them kudos what do you think really happens in that scenario?


Eventually yes...they would have to try and convince the public that these Hackers are a threat to them. They could convince many governments or convince others to go along with them and help them...that's not hard since Wikileaks is challenging almost all power centers. Anonymous may have right and guts on their side but they are still human beings. What happens to human beings in a group when a few of them get taken to Guantanamo Bay or just killed outright.

Sometimes that type of suppression works and sometimes it doesn't. With the backing of other governments the US could shut down the internet as a response. Also China wouldn't be happy with Anon at all unless they had them under their thumb.

What Anon has to do is appeal to the public which I've seen a bit of but would like to see more. Take any south american country...kill a few social activists there using US proxy forces and as long as the media doesn't report it much it's all fine...stays quiet. Anon having roots in the activist community in the US and some sympathy from the broader public and it's a difference story when one of them gets taken out.

Supporting Anon means being realistic as to who they are and what they can do. Not just saying "Yay Anon do it for the Lols!" They need wide support or we have nameless people being thrown in jail or killed somewhere in the world and no one cares because we have no fucking clue who they are or what they represent.

>> ^Yogi:

>> ^raverman:
If you're going to declare war, you better be sure you can defend as well as attack.
They are legion...
Are you? Can you fight off 10 to 1 highly skilled and motivated individuals?

If the US government is on your side and they think it's important enough to find out where these people are and kill them then yeah. Obviously that's not what happened here...just a dumb CEO making claims he can't back up.
Look I love Anon, and Wikileaks, but if the US wanted to be big bad Empire...they could spill a LOT of blood.


I agree, but I think the U.S. would lose that war eventually unless they can get everyone (they can't) everywhere (they won't, that's war; playing illegal arrest on foreign grounds). The U.S. is not Superman. But, Anonymous has one very deadly weapon, knowledge and a plan of action (as proofed by this guys upheaval). They would lose as a PR game. Sure in the U.S. things might seem semi-peachy, but outside we'd have little footing to stand on. I literally think it would cause an inverted response that you may think they're ready for, but the U.S. has sucked at International PR for a long time. Causing people to "disappear" or arresting them only unleashes the dogs of war.

I frankly don't see the U.S. being able to hold up (certainly, as some countries like China would be happy to have anon). It would be a terrible decision and one they won't make, as we'll be a dictatorship by then. If Colbert is giving them kudos what do you think really happens in that scenario?